
If you think you’re right about something – like, if you’re totally convinced of it and have been for a long time, to the extent that it’s something you don’t even think about any more – you should talk to Fiona. Not because she’ll convince you that you’re wrong (although she might) but becasue she’ll make you think about it more than you have before, and she’ll do it in a way that gives you a lot of room to maneuver your way to your own conclusions, rather than bullying you over to where she thinks you should be. Also, when you realize you might be wrong, Fiona will be kind of apologetic about it, like maybe she was misguided once too – not about this, but maybe some other stuff – and understands where you might have gone off track.
An evening with Fiona is an exercise in aimless but not desultory conversation, and in the kind of debate that never results in acrimony. For instance, Fiona asserts that Texas Hold ’em is the Cadillac of poker games and presents an elegant and cogent argument in support, but I don’t know that I think Cadillacs are appropriate in poker, unless they’re the kind with a blaring wish-I-was-in-Dixie horn and a cow skull on the front driven by, essentially, Boss Hogg, which takes away from the essential Cadillacness of the vehicle. I think a reliable old Ford or, in some parts of the country, a Chevy, is much more in the spirit of poker. I like five-card draw and seven card stud, and and maybe every five or six hands a weird game where half the cards are wild.
She gets to explain Texas Hold ’em to me, or at least why she thinks Texas Hold ’em is a good game, and I get to explain the infield fly rule to her. I have a little bit of practice at this; one of the great triumphs of my life as a person who talks was explaining the infield fly rule to an Icelandic physicist who started off the day asking me where on the field the wingers played. Also, I was present at the ballpark a few years ago for a great game whose story requires explaining the infield fly rule, so I have had to refine my skill there. Fiona also espouses the view that we, as citizens of the United States, should refer to ourselves as USians, or at least not as Americans, on the grounds that we do not represent all of the Americas. I disagree, but I haven’t yet figured out how to argue my position, and I am also – because it is Fiona – way in the background entertaining the possibility that she might be right. I’m fighting hard against that, and I’ll get back to everyone later.

There is also more Giants/As baseball, a good game that starts off routine, tightens up for a worrying couple of innings, and then sees the Giants play like a team that didn’t get outscored 34-9 last week, finishing up with an 8-3 win that’s a lot more of what we expect from the current Giants vs. the current As than what we saw last night. The chants of “SELL THE TEAM” are fewer and farther between, and the crowd smaller, but Oakland fans are still very much present, including a couple of kids, maybe ten or so, who perpetrate a two-man wave right in front of us. With this win, the Giants move into sole possession of second place in the NL West, just three games behind what my dad and Gerry Garner refer to as the HFD, the D standing for Dodgers. HF Dodgers, I now realize, sounds like a truly terrible theme restaurant that you’d find in a mall.

What did you think of the evening, Fiona?
“I had a fun time! It was great to watch one of the last Battles by the Bay, should the A’s leave. And, as Van Morrison might say, the crack is always good with Justin.
craic*! not crack
nah, crack is fine.”








































